Latency Is a Tax on Reactive Trading
The faster the move, the more your click becomes a donation.
Backtests, feeds, bias, and the lies your dataset tells.
The faster the move, the more your click becomes a donation.
Backtests pay the spread once and assume clean fills. Live trading pays it twice, plus a tax you didn’t model.
Slippage clusters. If you treat it as rare, your risk model is fiction.
Every extra filter can make a backtest look smarter while making the result less trustworthy by starving the sample size.
A backtest describes a past environment; it does not guarantee the future microstructure will keep paying you the same way.
If tiny parameter tweaks flip results, you didn’t find structure, you found noise with a good story.
If your edge only exists on one feed, one session cutoff, or one candle construction, it’s not an edge, it’s an artifact.
Many ‘patterns’ disappear when you control for time-of-day, because the real driver is liquidity cycles, not chart magic.
A backtest that looks unusually smooth usually means you removed the messy friction that will show up live and break expectancy.
Your ‘edge’ can be an artifact of data choices: feeds, session cutoffs, revisions, survivorship, and cleaning rules.
Paper trading removes the two things that break strategies: execution friction and human fear.
You mostly see winners because losers disappear, so your ‘base rates’ are fantasy.
Most strategies are secretly ‘one-regime strategies’ pretending to be universal.