Tick Size Sets Your Stop Distance
Stops live on a grid. If your stop is “between ticks,” it gets rounded into a different risk level than you planned.
Sizing, expectancy, and rules that keep variance from becoming death.
Stops live on a grid. If your stop is “between ticks,” it gets rounded into a different risk level than you planned.
A partial fill is a new position with a new plan. If you treat it like a “broken” order, you’ll improvise your way into oversized risk.
A market order is not “get me in.” It’s “fill me wherever you can.” In thin or fast markets, that’s expensive.
A tight spread is agreement. Volatility breaks agreement. Treat widening spreads as a risk signal, not bad luck.
Stops and position size assume fills. Slippage is where the assumptions break.
You can often get in. Getting out at your intended price is the real privilege.
Most stops sit in the same obvious places. Price doesn’t need malice to find them.
Slippage clusters. If you treat it as rare, your risk model is fiction.
Scaling out is not a neutral tweak: it rewires your payoff distribution and can quietly remove the winners that make the system work.
If you don’t know the pip/tick value and notional exposure, your position size is a guess, and guesses become leverage.
A fixed take-profit is a ceiling on your winners; if you cap the right tail, you must win more often or you will bleed out after costs.
If you can lose 1R five times in a session, your real risk is 5R, no matter what your ‘risk per trade’ says.
A tight stop is not safety, it’s either smaller size or more churn, and most people quietly choose churn.
If volatility doubles and you keep the same position size, you doubled your risk whether you admit it or not.
A trailing stop that isn’t anchored to structure will usually trail into normal noise and convert winners into scratches.
Correct direction is not profitability if your payoff shape, timing, and costs are wrong.
If your strategy collects frequent small wins and fears big moves, you are effectively short volatility, whether you trade options or not.
Many high win-rate strategies are just selling tail risk: they look genius until they meet the one loss that matters.
Most stops are placed where you emotionally want to be wrong, not where the trade is actually wrong.
Moving stops to break-even too early converts winners into scratches and quietly destroys expectancy.